Kieffe v. United States

District Court, D. South Dakota·Decided January 28, 2020·No. 5:19-cv-05067·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION

CHARLES KIEFFE, 5:19-CV-05067-JLV Plaintiff, Ws. ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

This matter is before the court pursuant to petitioner Charles Kieffe’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3006(a)(1)} and (c}, and United States District Judge Jeffrey L. Viken’s Standing Order dated October 31, 2019, the Federal Public Defender for the Districts of South

_ Dakota and North Dakota was appointed to represent all financially eligible

defendants in criminal cases in this district who may be eligible to seek a reduced or modified sentence based upon the decision in United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019) and subsequent Court decisions. Mr. Kieffe’s § 2255 habeas petition seeks to reduce or modify his sentence pursuant to United States v. Davis. This Court entered an Order granting the Federal Public Defender for the District of South Dakota’s motion to withdraw from Mr. Kieffe’s case due to a continuing conflict of interest. (Doc. 13). Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that Ellery Grey is hereby appointed to represent the petitioner in the above entitled case. DATED this IE say of January, 2020.

BY THE COURT:

DANETA WOLLMANN United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kieffe v. United States, (D.S.D. 2020).

Kieffe v. United States (Kieffe v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Davis
588 U.S. 445 (Supreme Court, 2019)