Kiefer's Ex'x v. Deibel

184 S.W.2d 225, 298 Ky. 813, 1944 Ky. LEXIS 1019
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)·Decided December 12, 1944·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Harris

Affirming.

This action involves a contest as to the validity of an instrument of writing which was probated in the Jefferson County Court as the will of Minnie Kiefer, deceased, and is in this court for the second time. Upon the first trial the jury found against the proponents under peremptory instructions, and that action was reversed by this Court. Kiefer’s Ex’r and Ex’x v. Deibel, 292 Ky. 318, 166 S. W. 2d 430. Upon the second trial, under instructions on the merits of the case, the jury found that the writing in question was not the will of Minnie Kiefer. Prom that verdict, and the judgment which was entered thereon, the proponents have appealed.

The purported bill of exceptions having been stricken, on motion of the appellees, on the ground that there was no order of the lower court filing same and making it a part of the record, we have looked only to the pleadings to ascertain whether they support the verdict and judgment. It is our opinion that they do. Easley & Siegelman v. Kramer, 264 Ky. 425, 94 S. W. 2d 1030.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kiefer's Ex'x v. Deibel, 184 S.W.2d 225, 298 Ky. 813, 1944 Ky. LEXIS 1019 (Ky. 1944).

184 S.W.2d 225 (Kiefer's Ex'x v. Deibel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hartman v. Deibel
208 S.W.2d 949 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1948)