Kiefer v. State
139 N.E. 852, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 72, 106 Ohio St. 285, 1922 Ohio LEXIS 246
Opinion
A charge in an affidavit, “did then and there solicit an order for intoxicating liquors,” does not charge the offense to “solicit . . . any intoxicating liquors,” as defined in Section 3 (6212-15, General Code) of “An Act to prohibit the liquor traffic and to provide for the administration and enforcement of such prohibition.” (108 O. L., pt. 2, 1182.)
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kiefer v. State, 139 N.E. 852, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 72, 106 Ohio St. 285, 1922 Ohio LEXIS 246 (Ohio 1922).
139 N.E. 852 (Kiefer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. Gault v. Medina Cty. Court of Common Pleas Clerk
2025 Ohio 4699 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2025)
Obetz v. McClain (Slip Opinion)
2021 Ohio 1706 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2021)
State v. Craig (Slip Opinion)
2020 Ohio 455 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2020)
Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow v. Ohio Dept. of Edn. (Slip Opinion)
2018 Ohio 3126 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2018)
State v. New
968 N.E.2d 607 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2012)
City of Toledo v. Thompson-Bean
879 N.E.2d 799 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
Adamson v. Ohio State Med. Bd., Unpublished Decision (9-30-2004)
2004 Ohio 5261 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)
State v. Davidson
723 N.E.2d 172 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1998)
State v. Loless
507 N.E.2d 1140 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1986)
State v. Glover
479 N.E.2d 901 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1984)
State v. Dorso
446 N.E.2d 449 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1983)