Kiefer v. Schwamb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kiefer v. Schwamb

242 A.D. 636

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1934

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 242 A.D. 636 (Kiefer v. Schwamb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kiefer v. Schwamb, 242 A.D. 636 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, in so far as appealed from, fixing lien of attorney, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and matter remitted to the Special Term to take testimony in relation to the value of the respondent’s services and to fix the lien therefor. (Matter of Krooks, 257 N. Y. 329; Matter of Tillman, 259 id. 133; Johnson v. Ravitch, 113 App. Div. 810.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, in so far as appealed from, fixing lien of attorney, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and matter remitted to the Special Term to take testimony in relation to the value of the respondent’s services and to fix the lien therefor. (Matter of Krooks, 257 N. Y. 329; Matter of Tillman, 259 id. 133; Johnson v. Ravitch, 113 App. Div. 810.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D. 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kiefer-v-schwamb-nyappdiv-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack