Kiefer v. Markley
774 N.W.2d 688, 485 Mich. 968
Opinion
Marilyn J. KIEFER and George Kiefer, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
John M. MARKLEY, M.D., and Center for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, P.C., Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 28, 2009 judgment *689 of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, C.J., and MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and HATHAWAY, JJ., would reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals, for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion, and remand this case to the Washtenaw Circuit Court for reinstatement of the complaint.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kiefer v. Markley, 774 N.W.2d 688, 485 Mich. 968 (Mich. 2009).
774 N.W.2d 688 (Kiefer v. Markley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.