Kidder v. State of Florida
This text of Kidder v. State of Florida (Kidder v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2025-1808 _____________________________
NICHOLAS KIDDER,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. Clifton A. Drake, Judge.
December 3, 2025
PER CURIAM.
The Court dismisses the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(4) (“Orders disposing of motions for rehearing or motions that suspend rendition are not reviewable separately from a review of the final order . . . .”); Wilson v. State, 944 So. 2d 1100, 1101 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (finding that appeal was untimely because unauthorized, successive motions for rehearing did not toll rendition of the underlying order).
ROBERTS, KELSEY, and LONG, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Nicholas Kidder, pro se, Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kidder v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kidder-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.