Kidder v. Sawyer

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Kidder v. Sawyer

64 Me. 472

DecidedJuly 1, 1874

StatusPublished

This text of 64 Me. 472 (Kidder v. Sawyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kidder v. Sawyer, 64 Me. 472 (Me. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

Walton, J.

When, in any case pending upon the law docket upon motion or exceptions, there is an entry upon the district clerk’s docket, made either by consent of parties or by order of the court, that copies or arguments are to be furnished within a certain time, or the motion or exceptions to be overruled, if the required copies or arguments are not placed in the hands of the chief justice within the time limited, the case will be disposed of under the direction of the chief justice in accordance with such entry without further examination or consultation.

Exertions overruled.

Appleton, C. J., Diokerson, Barrows, Yirgin and Peters, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walton, J.

When, in any case pending upon the law docket upon motion or exceptions, there is an entry upon the district clerk’s docket, made either by consent of parties or by order of the court, that copies or arguments are to be furnished within a certain time, or the motion or exceptions to be overruled, if the required copies or arguments are not placed in the hands of the chief justice within the time limited, the case will be disposed of under the direction of the chief justice in accordance with such entry without further examination or consultation.

Exertions overruled.

Appleton, C. J., Diokerson, Barrows, Yirgin and Peters, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 Me. 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kidder-v-sawyer-me-1874.