Kidd v. Greyhound Lines Inc

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1119

DONALD X. KIDD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GREYHOUND LINES, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Dennis W. Dohnal, Magistrate Judge. (CA-04-277)

Submitted: June 8, 2005 Decided: June 22, 2005

Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald X. Kidd, Appellant Pro Se. Karla Grossenbacher, Annamaria Locsin Nields, SEYFARTH SHAW, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Donald X. Kidd appeals the district court’s order*

granting summary judgment to the Defendant on his claims of

employment discrimination and retaliation based on race, sex,

religion, and disability, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000), and the Americans

with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213 (2000). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kidd v.

Greyhound Lines, Inc., No. CA-04-277 (E.D. Va. Jan. 20, 2005). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The case was decided by a magistrate judge with the parties’ consent. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

- 2 -