Kidd v. Bingham

129 So. 3d 1021, 2013 WL 2278598, 2013 Ala. LEXIS 50
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 24, 2013
Docket1110767
StatusPublished

This text of 129 So. 3d 1021 (Kidd v. Bingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kidd v. Bingham, 129 So. 3d 1021, 2013 WL 2278598, 2013 Ala. LEXIS 50 (Ala. 2013).

Opinion

MURDOCK, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

STUART, BOLIN, PARKER, SHAW, MAIN, and WISE, JJ., concur. MOORE, C.J., dissents. BRYAN, J., recuses himself.*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horsley v. Horsley
280 So. 2d 155 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 So. 3d 1021, 2013 WL 2278598, 2013 Ala. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kidd-v-bingham-ala-2013.