Kidd v. Bingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Kidd v. Bingham

129 So. 3d 1021, 2013 WL 2278598, 2013 Ala. LEXIS 50

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided May 24, 2013·No. 1110767·Published

Opinion

MURDOCK, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

STUART, BOLIN, PARKER, SHAW, MAIN, and WISE, JJ., concur. MOORE, C.J., dissents. BRYAN, J., recuses himself.*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MURDOCK, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

STUART, BOLIN, PARKER, SHAW, MAIN, and WISE, JJ., concur. MOORE, C.J., dissents. BRYAN, J., recuses himself.*

Kidd v. Bingham, 129 So. 3d 1021, 2013 WL 2278598, 2013 Ala. LEXIS 50 (Ala. 2013).

Pincite

129 So. 3d 1021 (Kidd v. Bingham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related