K.I.D. v. Wilkins

599 F. App'x 118
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 10, 2015·No. No. 14-1846·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

K.I.D., H. Mitchell Douglas and Angela L. Douglas, appeal the district court’s order dismissing this action raising claims of strict liability, gross negligence, and negligence per se stemming from a deputy sheriffs sexual abuse of a minor high school student. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. K.I.D. v. Wilkins, No. 3:14-cv-00177-JAG, 2014 WL 3616131 (E.D.Va. July 18, 2014).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

K.I.D. v. Wilkins, 599 F. App'x 118 (4th Cir. 2015).

599 F. App'x 118 (K.I.D. v. Wilkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.