Kicklighter v. Little

30 S.E. 933, 105 Ga. 500, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 625
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 8, 1898·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, P. J.

Though the judge read to the jury a section of the code which was not precisely applicable to the questions involved, a new •trial will not be granted when it appears that the reading of this section was not really prejudicial to the complaining party, that the [501] charge as a whole fairly submitted to the jury the issues upon which they were to pass, and that the verdict rendered was fully warranted by the evidence and apparently in accord with the truth and justice of the case. . Judgment affirmed.

Submitted May 23, Decided June 8, 1898. Levy and claim. Before II. B. Strange, judge pro hae vice. Jefferson superior court. November term, 1896. Hudson & Wright and W. 1~‡. & E. B. Black, for plaintiff in error. Phillips & Phillips, contra. All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kicklighter v. Little, 30 S.E. 933, 105 Ga. 500, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 625 (Ga. 1898).

30 S.E. 933 (Kicklighter v. Little) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. Tyre
40 S.E. 699 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)