Kicklighter v. Little

Supreme Court of Georgia

Kicklighter v. Little

30 S.E. 933, 105 Ga. 500, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 625

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 8, 1898

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 30 S.E. 933 (Kicklighter v. Little) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kicklighter v. Little, 30 S.E. 933, 105 Ga. 500, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 625 (Ga. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Lumpkin, P. J.

Though the judge read to the jury a section of the code which was not precisely applicable to the questions involved, a new •trial will not be granted when it appears that the reading of this section was not really prejudicial to the complaining party, that the [501]*501charge as a whole fairly submitted to the jury the issues upon which they were to pass, and that the verdict rendered was fully warranted by the evidence and apparently in accord with the truth and justice of the case. . Judgment affirmed.

Submitted May 23, Decided June 8, 1898.

Levy and claim. Before II. B. Strange, judge pro hae vice. Jefferson superior court. November term, 1896.

Hudson & Wright and W. 1~‡. & E. B. Black, for plaintiff in error. Phillips & Phillips, contra. All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lumpkin, P. J.

Though the judge read to the jury a section of the code which was not precisely applicable to the questions involved, a new •trial will not be granted when it appears that the reading of this section was not really prejudicial to the complaining party, that the [501]*501charge as a whole fairly submitted to the jury the issues upon which they were to pass, and that the verdict rendered was fully warranted by the evidence and apparently in accord with the truth and justice of the case. . Judgment affirmed.

Submitted May 23, Decided June 8, 1898.

Levy and claim. Before II. B. Strange, judge pro hae vice. Jefferson superior court. November term, 1896.

Hudson & Wright and W. 1~‡. & E. B. Black, for plaintiff in error. Phillips & Phillips, contra. All the Justices concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 S.E. 933, 105 Ga. 500, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kicklighter-v-little-ga-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack