Kickham Hanley Pllc v. Oakland County Michigan
This text of Kickham Hanley Pllc v. Oakland County Michigan (Kickham Hanley Pllc v. Oakland County Michigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
April 29, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
159758 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra KICKHAM HANLEY PLLC, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellant, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 159758 COA: 341076 Oakland CC: 2017-159351-CZ OAKLAND COUNTY MICHIGAN, Defendant, and
GEORGE W. KUHN DRAINAGE DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 2, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 29, 2020 t0420 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kickham Hanley Pllc v. Oakland County Michigan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kickham-hanley-pllc-v-oakland-county-michigan-mich-2020.