Kick v. Calumet & South Chicago Railway Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Kick v. Calumet & South Chicago Railway Co.

208 Ill. App. 325

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedDecember 3, 1917

DocketGen. No. 23,325

StatusPublished

This text of 208 Ill. App. 325 (Kick v. Calumet & South Chicago Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kick v. Calumet & South Chicago Railway Co., 208 Ill. App. 325 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

6. Stbeet baileoads, § 73*—when failure to ring gong or absence of lights is immaterial. Failure to ring a gong or have lights upon an approaching street car is net important where one injured in crossing the track admits having seen the car approaching before his vehicle went upon the track. 7. Stbeet baileoads, § 131*—when evidence shows contributory negligence in crossing track with vehicle. Evidence in an action to recover for personal injuries through colliding with a street car in crossing the track, held to show plaintiff’s contributory negligence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

6. Stbeet baileoads, § 73*—when failure to ring gong or absence of lights is immaterial. Failure to ring a gong or have lights upon an approaching street car is net important where one injured in crossing the track admits having seen the car approaching before his vehicle went upon the track. 7. Stbeet baileoads, § 131*—when evidence shows contributory negligence in crossing track with vehicle. Evidence in an action to recover for personal injuries through colliding with a street car in crossing the track, held to show plaintiff’s contributory negligence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 Ill. App. 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kick-v-calumet-south-chicago-railway-co-illappct-1917.