Kichinko v. Scarborough

20 So. 2d 127, 155 Fla. 358, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 545
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 19, 1944
StatusPublished

This text of 20 So. 2d 127 (Kichinko v. Scarborough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kichinko v. Scarborough, 20 So. 2d 127, 155 Fla. 358, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 545 (Fla. 1944).

Opinion

*359 PER CURIAM:

The record and the briefs in this cause have been.examined and the peremptory writ of mandamus is awarded on authority of Singer, et al., v. Scarborough, decided this date, a like question being involved in both cases.

■It is so ordered.

BUFORD, C. J., TERRELL, BROWN, CHAPMAN, THOMAS, ADAMS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 So. 2d 127, 155 Fla. 358, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kichinko-v-scarborough-fla-1944.