KIBURIS v. State
Opinion
Richard Wallace Kiburis appeals the revocation of his probation and resulting prison sentence. We affirm the judgment and sentence but remand for entry of a written order of revocation of probation.
When Mr. Kiburis attempted to correct the trial court’s failure to render a separate written order of revocation by filing a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b), the trial court denied relief stating that “collectively, the judgment and sentence constitutes [sic] a sufficient written order revoking probation to facilitate appellate review of the revocation.” We do not agree. See Moschiano v. State, 12 So.3d 922 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Dawkins v. State, 936 So.2d 710 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).
Affirmed; remanded with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
18 So. 3d 1254 (KIBURIS v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.