Kibiuk v. Windsor Residences, Inc.
184 Misc. 186, 54 N.Y.S.2d 117, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1657
Opinion
Plaintiff’s proofs do not fully sustain her alleged cause of action.
On appeal by defendant Windsor Besidences, Inc., the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to said appellant to abide the event.
Appeal from the order should be dismissed.
On plaintiff’s appeal the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Hammer, McLaughlin and Eder, JJ., concur.
Judgment accordingly.
See, also, Rufo v. South Brooklyn Sav. Bank, 268 App. Div. 1057, and cf. McCabe v. Cohen, 268 App. Div. 1064.— [Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kibiuk v. Windsor Residences, Inc., 184 Misc. 186, 54 N.Y.S.2d 117, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1657 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1945).
184 Misc. 186 (Kibiuk v. Windsor Residences, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rufo v. South Brooklyn Savings Bank
268 A.D. 1057 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)
McCabe v. Cohen
268 A.D. 1064 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)