Kibby v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Kibby v. State

211 S.W.3d 639, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 89, 2007 WL 92612

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 16, 2007

DocketED 87892

StatusPublished

This text of 211 S.W.3d 639 (Kibby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kibby v. State, 211 S.W.3d 639, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 89, 2007 WL 92612 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Reginald Kibby (“Movant”), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Following a jury trial, Movant was convicted of one count of murder in the first degree (“Count I”), section 565.020, RSMo 1994, 1 one count of armed criminal action (“Count II”), section 571.015, and one count of robbery in the first degree (“Count III”), section 569.020. Movant was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of probation or parole for Count I, twenty-five years of imprisonment for Count II, and twenty-five years of imprisonment for Count III, with the sentences to run concurrently. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment of the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 1994 unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Reginald Kibby (“Movant”), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Following a jury trial, Movant was convicted of one count of murder in the first degree (“Count I”), section 565.020, RSMo 1994, 1 one count of armed criminal action (“Count II”), section 571.015, and one count of robbery in the first degree (“Count III”), section 569.020. Movant was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of probation or parole for Count I, twenty-five years of imprisonment for Count II, and twenty-five years of imprisonment for Count III, with the sentences to run concurrently. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment of the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 1994 unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 S.W.3d 639, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 89, 2007 WL 92612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kibby-v-state-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack