Kibble v. State
92 So. 910, 18 Ala. App. 453, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 142
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of forgery in the second degree, and sentenced to the penitentiary for an indeterminate term of years.
The demurrers to the indictment were properly overruled. The indictment follows form 62 set out in the Code of 1907, § 7161, and is sufficient.
There is no hill of exceptions, and the time for filing one has expired. We find no error in the record, and the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kibble v. State, 92 So. 910, 18 Ala. App. 453, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 142 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).
92 So. 910 (Kibble v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Franklin v. State
259 So. 2d 863 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1972)
Lindsey v. State
128 So. 209 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1930)