Kibble v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Kibble v. State

92 So. 910, 18 Ala. App. 453, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 142

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 18, 1922

Docket8 Div. 885.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 92 So. 910 (Kibble v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kibble v. State, 92 So. 910, 18 Ala. App. 453, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 142 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

MERRITT, J.

The defendant was convicted of forgery in the second degree, and sentenced to the penitentiary for an indeterminate term of years.

The demurrers to the indictment were properly overruled. The indictment follows form 62 set out in the Code of 1907, § 7161, and is sufficient.

There is no hill of exceptions, and the time for filing one has expired. We find no error in the record, and the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI