Ki Pong Na v. United Central Bank

Opinion

1)ISM ISS: Opinion Filed January 1 . 2013.

in The nttrt 01 ppia1 1ift1! tlitrict iif 1i.xti at Ja11w5 No. 05-12-01203-CV

KI PONG NA, C [lONG SOOK NA, COCO C-STORE, INC., & KSCJ INVESTMENTS, INC., Appellants

V.

UNITED CENTRAL BANK, DONC SIK YO() A/KJA J1MLVIY YOO, 1NSUK SUNG, YOUNG 110 AHN, HANS S. Y00, AND HAS S. YOO, P.C., ippellees

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court 1)allas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-10-08730-K

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Francis and Lang-Miers Opinion By Chief Justice Wright

By notice of appeal filed September 4, 2012, appellants Ki PongNa, Chong SookNA, Coco

C-Store, Inc., and KSCJ Investments, Inc. appeal the trial court’s July 27, 2011, October 21, 2011,

and June 5, 2012 partial summary judgments. These summary judgments, collectively with other

court nilings, dispose of appellants’ claims against appellees. However, they do not, either

individually or collectively with other rulings, dispose of appellee United Central Bank’s

counterclaims against appellants. Because, subject to certain mostly statutory exceptions not

applicable here, we have jurisdiction only over judgments that dispose of all parties and claims, we

directed the parties to file letter briefs addressing our jurisdiction over the appeal. See Lehmann v. I1cir—Cn Coi’p., 39 SW.3d 191 195 (Tex. 2001 ). The parties complied and agree that United

Central [lank’s connierelaims remain pending and we lack nrisdiut ion over the appeal .‘\ccordinglv.

we dismiss the appeal. See Tix. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

( \1U)[ WRl(flf —

C Hit I JUS9 i() // 7/ /

121 203F.P05 (!niirt nf .$1pcthi .FiftI! JiEitrtct nf xai at Da11zn

JUDGMENT KI PONG NA. C HONG SO()K NA. COCO Appeal ti’om the I 92nd .Iudicial District Court C -SIORI INC ANI) KSCJ of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct. No. 10— INVESTMENTS, INC.. Appellants 08730-K). Opinion delivered by Chief’ Justice Wright. No, 05-I 2-01 203-CV v Justices Francis and Lang-Miers participating.

UNITED CENTRAL BANK, DONG SIK YOO A/KIA JlMM YOO INSUK SUNG OUNG HO AIIN HANS S ‘ZOO AND 1-fANS S. YOO P.C.. Appellees

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date. we DISMISS the appeal. We ORDER that appellees United Central Bank, Dong Sik Yoo ar’ka Jimmy Yoo. Insuk Sung. Young Ho Ahn. Hans S. Yoo and Hans S. Yoo, P.C. recover their costs, if any, of this appeal from appellants Ki Pong N i C hong Sook N i C oo C —Stoic Inc md KS I ln Lstmcnts Inc

Judgment entered January 18, 2013.

/ /-/— / / VAROLYN RffT CHIEF JUST1CF