Home/Ohio Court of Appeals/Khoury v. Board of Liquor Control

Khoury v. Board of Liquor Control

153 N.E.2d 334, 78 Ohio Law. Abs. 468, 1957 Ohio App. LEXIS 1023
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 23, 1957
DocketNo. 5677
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 153 N.E.2d 334 (Khoury v. Board of Liquor Control) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Khoury v. Board of Liquor Control, 153 N.E.2d 334, 78 Ohio Law. Abs. 468, 1957 Ohio App. LEXIS 1023 (Ohio Ct. App. 1957).

Opinion

OPINION

By THE COURT.

We have examined the record in this case and considered the assignments of error, briefs and the oral arguments of counsel and are of the opinion that none of the assigned errors are well taken. Judge Bartlett in a well-considered opinion (74 Abs 492, 498) reviewed the legal questions' presented and came to the proper conclusion, that the order of the Board of Liquor Control was supported by “reliable, probative and substantial evidence and is in accordance with law.” We adopt the opinion of Judge Bartlett and will affirm the judgment.

PETREE, PJ, MILLER and HORNBECK, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Pepsico, Inc., Pepsico, Inc., Third-Party v. Banner Industries, Inc., Third-Party
884 F.2d 688 (Second Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
153 N.E.2d 334, 78 Ohio Law. Abs. 468, 1957 Ohio App. LEXIS 1023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/khoury-v-board-of-liquor-control-ohioctapp-1957.