Khosrow Sadeghian v. Willie Hudspeth
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-11-00095-CV
KHOSROW SADEGHIAN APPELLANT
V.
WILLIE HUDSPETH APPELLEE
------------
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF DENTON COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On April 11, 2011, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk
responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed this court that
arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk=s record as required by
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2).
We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. appellant, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk=s record
and provided this court with proof of payment.
Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk=s
record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want
of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.
37.3(b), 42.3(b).
Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.
DELIVERED: June 2, 2011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Khosrow Sadeghian v. Willie Hudspeth (Khosrow Sadeghian v. Willie Hudspeth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.