Khattak v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Khattak v. United States

297 F. App'x 236

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 24, 2008·No. No. 08-1815·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ayaz Anwar Khattak appeals the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice his civil action filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Khattak v. United States, No. 1:08-cv-00507-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. filed June 19, 2008, entered June 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Ayaz Anwar Khattak appeals the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice his civil action filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Khattak v. United States, No. 1:08-cv-00507-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. filed June 19, 2008, entered June 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Khattak v. United States, 297 F. App'x 236 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

297 F. App'x 236 (Khattak v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.