Khatib v. Liverpool Central School District

244 A.D.2d 957, 668 N.Y.S.2d 130, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12350
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1997·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioners, as limited by their brief, do not challenge any part of the judgment on appeal, but instead challenge only dicta in Supreme Court’s decision. Thus, the appeal must be dismissed (see, Schuster v Schweitzer, 203 AD2d 552). In any event, because the children have been readmitted to respondent [958] school district, the appeal is moot. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Tormey, J.—CPLR art 78.) Present—Denman, P. J., Hayes, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Khatib v. Liverpool Central School District, 244 A.D.2d 957, 668 N.Y.S.2d 130, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12350 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

244 A.D.2d 957 (Khatib v. Liverpool Central School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adirondack Bank, N.A. v. CBB Realty, LLC
222 A.D.3d 1422 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
VISCUSO, ANGELO M. v. VISCUSO, SUSAN M.
129 A.D.3d 1679 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Mohr v. Greenan
37 A.D.3d 1094 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Companion Life Insurance v. All State Abstract Corp.
35 A.D.3d 518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Farr v. Covert
34 A.D.3d 1204 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Lake Grove Partners, LLC v. Middleton
29 A.D.3d 794 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)