Home/Ninth Circuit/Khatib v. County of Orange

Khatib v. County of Orange

622 F.3d 1074, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 19055, 2010 WL 3611503
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Khatib v. County of Orange. Read the opinion of the Court — 639 F.3d 898 →
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 13, 2010·No. 08-56423·Published

Opinion

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge REINHARDT did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Khatib v. County of Orange, 622 F.3d 1074, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 19055, 2010 WL 3611503 (9th Cir. 2010).

622 F.3d 1074 (Khatib v. County of Orange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Khatib v. County of Orange
622 F.3d 1074 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)