Khanyile v. Roosevelt Hospital
158 A.D.2d 290, 550 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1071
Opinion
In this medical malpractice action there were long periods of inactivity. The plaintiff failed to satisfy the conditions of a prior order vacating her default. Therefore, the IAS court acted within its discretion. Contrary to plaintiffs position, this [291] action was not stayed because of proceedings brought in Federal court. The filing of a notice of appeal does not result in a stay. (Catalane v Plaza 400 Owners Corp., 124 AD2d 478, 480.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Kassal and Rosenberger, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Khanyile v. Roosevelt Hospital, 158 A.D.2d 290, 550 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1071 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).
158 A.D.2d 290 (Khanyile v. Roosevelt Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Catalane v. Plaza 400 Owners Corp.
124 A.D.2d 478 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)