Khalsa v. Puri
This text of Khalsa v. Puri (Khalsa v. Puri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
No. A-1-CA-42080
SOPURKH KAUR KHALSA, SHAKTI PARWHA KAUR KHALSA, and EK ONG KAR KAUR KHALSA, Trustees of the Yogi Bhajan Administrative Trust,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
INDERJIT KAUR PURI,
Defendant-Appellant,
and
SURJIT SONI,
Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY Maria Sanchez Gagne, District Court Judge
Sanders & Westbrook, PC Maureen A. Sanders Albuquerque, NM
for Appellee
Bowles Law Firm Jason Bowles Albuquerque, NM
The Soni Law Firm Surjit P. Soni Pasadena, CA
for Appellant Inderjit Kaur Puri
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HANISEE Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
WE CONCUR:
ZACHARY A. IVES, Judge
JANE B. YOHALEM, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Khalsa v. Puri, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/khalsa-v-puri-nmctapp-2025.