Khalifh v. Bush

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedMay 1, 2009
DocketCivil Action No. 2005-1189
StatusPublished

This text of Khalifh v. Bush (Khalifh v. Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Khalifh v. Bush, (D.D.C. 2009).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

OMAR MOHAMMED KHALIFH, et al., : : Petitioners, : : v. : Civil Action No. 05-1189 (JR) : BARACK OBAMA, et al., : : Respondents. :

ORDER

Upon review of Petitioner’s motion for discovery and

Respondents’ opposition, requests 3, 6, and 7 are denied, and

requests 1, 2, 4, and 5 are denied without prejudice to a further

motion filed with or after Petitioner’s traverse, showing that,

for specified reasons, Petitioner cannot present facts essential

to justify his traverse.

As agreed upon at the April 6, 2009 hearing, Petitioner

will file his traverse by May 27, 2009.

It is SO ORDERED.

JAMES ROBERTSON United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Khalifh v. Bush, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/khalifh-v-bush-dcd-2009.