Khalifh v. Bush
This text of Khalifh v. Bush (Khalifh v. Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
OMAR MOHAMMED KHALIFH, et al., : : Petitioners, : : v. : Civil Action No. 05-1189 (JR) : BARACK OBAMA, et al., : : Respondents. :
ORDER
Upon review of Petitioner’s motion for discovery and
Respondents’ opposition, requests 3, 6, and 7 are denied, and
requests 1, 2, 4, and 5 are denied without prejudice to a further
motion filed with or after Petitioner’s traverse, showing that,
for specified reasons, Petitioner cannot present facts essential
to justify his traverse.
As agreed upon at the April 6, 2009 hearing, Petitioner
will file his traverse by May 27, 2009.
It is SO ORDERED.
JAMES ROBERTSON United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Khalifh v. Bush, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/khalifh-v-bush-dcd-2009.