Khalees v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Khalees v. State

612 S.E.2d 799, 279 Ga. 301, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 1436, 2005 Ga. LEXIS 344

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 9, 2005

DocketS05A0492

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 612 S.E.2d 799 (Khalees v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Khalees v. State, 612 S.E.2d 799, 279 Ga. 301, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 1436, 2005 Ga. LEXIS 344 (Ga. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Fletcher, Chief Justice.

Frederick Bryant Khalees appeals from his convictions for malice murder and related crimes arising out of the shooting death of Kenneth Davis.¹ Finding no error, we affirm.

1. The evidence at trial showed that Khalees and the victim were once friends but had a falling out over money, which led Khalees to make threatening statements toward the victim. A week later, the victim was shot outside of the residence of Khalees’ girlfriend. The victim did not die until several weeks later, and identified Khalees as the shooter on more than one occasion. Cellular phone records also [302]*302placed Khalees near the crime scene and not at his home, where he claimed to be. After reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s determination of guilt, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that Khalees was guilty of the crimes for which he was convicted.²

Decided May 9, 2005. Patrick G. Longhi, for appellant. Paul L. Howard, Jr., District Attorney, Elizabeth A. Baker, Assistant District Attorney, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Robin J. Leigh, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

2. Contrary to Khalees’ assertions, trial counsel was not ineffective in questioning a State witness about an incident several months earlier where Khalees also drew a gun, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting similar transaction evidence.

For these reasons, we affirm.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

¹

The crimes occurred on August 4, 2002. On February 28, 2003, Khalees was indicted for malice murder, felony murder, aggravated assault, use of a firearm by a convicted felon, aggravated battery, and use of a firearm during the commission of a felony. On April 29, 2003, a Fulton County jury convicted Khalees on all counts. The aggravated assault conviction merged into the felony murder convictions, which were vacated by operation of law. Khalees was sentenced to life in prison for malice murder; twenty consecutive years for aggravated battery; fifteen consecutive years for use of a firearm by a convicted felon; and five consecutive years for use of a firearm during the commission of a felony. Khalees filed a timely motion for new trial on April 30, 2003. He amended his motion for new trial on March 11,2004, which was denied the same day. Khalees filed his timely notice of appeal on March 18, 2004. The case was docketed in this Court on November 19, 2004, and submitted on the briefs on January 10, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fletcher, Chief Justice.

Frederick Bryant Khalees appeals from his convictions for malice murder and related crimes arising out of the shooting death of Kenneth Davis.¹ Finding no error, we affirm.

1. The evidence at trial showed that Khalees and the victim were once friends but had a falling out over money, which led Khalees to make threatening statements toward the victim. A week later, the victim was shot outside of the residence of Khalees’ girlfriend. The victim did not die until several weeks later, and identified Khalees as the shooter on more than one occasion. Cellular phone records also [302]*302placed Khalees near the crime scene and not at his home, where he claimed to be. After reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s determination of guilt, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that Khalees was guilty of the crimes for which he was convicted.²

Decided May 9, 2005. Patrick G. Longhi, for appellant. Paul L. Howard, Jr., District Attorney, Elizabeth A. Baker, Assistant District Attorney, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Robin J. Leigh, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

2. Contrary to Khalees’ assertions, trial counsel was not ineffective in questioning a State witness about an incident several months earlier where Khalees also drew a gun, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting similar transaction evidence.

For these reasons, we affirm.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

¹

The crimes occurred on August 4, 2002. On February 28, 2003, Khalees was indicted for malice murder, felony murder, aggravated assault, use of a firearm by a convicted felon, aggravated battery, and use of a firearm during the commission of a felony. On April 29, 2003, a Fulton County jury convicted Khalees on all counts. The aggravated assault conviction merged into the felony murder convictions, which were vacated by operation of law. Khalees was sentenced to life in prison for malice murder; twenty consecutive years for aggravated battery; fifteen consecutive years for use of a firearm by a convicted felon; and five consecutive years for use of a firearm during the commission of a felony. Khalees filed a timely motion for new trial on April 30, 2003. He amended his motion for new trial on March 11,2004, which was denied the same day. Khalees filed his timely notice of appeal on March 18, 2004. The case was docketed in this Court on November 19, 2004, and submitted on the briefs on January 10, 2005.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

612 S.E.2d 799, 279 Ga. 301, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 1436, 2005 Ga. LEXIS 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/khalees-v-state-ga-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack