Khaleel A. Daniels-Oubre v. Texas Excel Property Management Services Corporation

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 20, 2025
Docket01-24-00639-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Khaleel A. Daniels-Oubre v. Texas Excel Property Management Services Corporation (Khaleel A. Daniels-Oubre v. Texas Excel Property Management Services Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Khaleel A. Daniels-Oubre v. Texas Excel Property Management Services Corporation, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Opinion issued February 20, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00639-CV ——————————— KHALEEL DANIELS, Appellant V. TEXAS EXCEL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES CORPORATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1230941

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Khaleel Daniels, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal from

the trial court’s August 26, 2024 final judgment. Appellant has failed to timely file

a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief). The record in this appeal was due on or before October 25, 2024. The clerk’s

record was filed on August 28, 2024. On October 25, 2025, the official court reporter

for the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County notified the Court that no

record was taken. Accordingly, appellant’s brief was due on November 27, 2024.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Appellant failed to timely file a brief.

On December 16, 2024, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the time

for filing a brief had expired and the appeal was subject to dismissal unless a brief,

or a motion to extend time to file a brief, was filed within ten days of the notice. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file brief), 42.3(b)

(allowing involuntary dismissal of appeal for want of prosecution), 42.3(c) (allowing

involuntary dismissal of case for failure to comply with notice from Clerk of Court).

Despite the notice that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not

adequately respond.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.3(b), (c); 43.2(f). All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Caughey, and Morgan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Khaleel A. Daniels-Oubre v. Texas Excel Property Management Services Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/khaleel-a-daniels-oubre-v-texas-excel-property-management-services-texapp-2025.