Khalan Ellington v. Lacretia Flowers

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedDecember 27, 2018
Docket18-1592
StatusUnpublished

This text of Khalan Ellington v. Lacretia Flowers (Khalan Ellington v. Lacretia Flowers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Khalan Ellington v. Lacretia Flowers, (8th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 18-1592 ___________________________

Khalan Ellington, ADC #655082

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Lacretia Flowers, Booking Agent, Faulkner County Detention Center Unit 2; Billy Kelly, Transport Officer, Faulkner County, Detention Center; Gary Andrews, Lieutenant

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Western Division ____________

Submitted: December 14, 2018 Filed: December 27, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Khalan Ellington — who was charged and convicted in two separate criminal cases — appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant

1 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the recommended disposition of the Honorable Beth M. Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. of summary judgment on a due process claim arising out of a delay in setting his first appearance in the second criminal case. Upon careful de novo review, viewing the record in the light most favorable to Ellington and drawing all reasonable inferences in his favor, we conclude that the totality of the circumstances of this case would not shock the conscience even if there were any possible violation on these facts. See Lucke v. Cty. of Hennepin, 415 F.3d 936, 939–40 (8th Cir. 2005); Hayes v. Faulkner Cty., 388 F.3d 669, 673–74 (8th Cir. 2004). We find that summary judgment was properly granted for the reasons stated in Magistrate Judge Deere’s Recommended Disposition dated January 24, 2018, as adopted by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. ______________________________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Luckes v. County Of Hennepin
415 F.3d 936 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Khalan Ellington v. Lacretia Flowers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/khalan-ellington-v-lacretia-flowers-ca8-2018.