Khaafid v. Bay State Gas Co.
697 N.E.2d 994, 428 Mass. 1004, 1998 Mass. LEXIS 474
This text of 697 N.E.2d 994 (Khaafid v. Bay State Gas Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Khaafid v. Bay State Gas Co., 697 N.E.2d 994, 428 Mass. 1004, 1998 Mass. LEXIS 474 (Mass. 1998).
Opinion
We assume, without deciding, that the denial of the motion is, for purposes of rule 2:21, an interlocutory ruling. The petitioner has not set forth in his memorandum, as rule 2:21 requires, “why review of the trial court decision cannot adequately be obtained on appeal from any final adverse judgment in the trial court or by other available means.”
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
697 N.E.2d 994, 428 Mass. 1004, 1998 Mass. LEXIS 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/khaafid-v-bay-state-gas-co-mass-1998.