K.H. v. J.R.
803 A.2d 1175, 569 Pa. 235, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 1647
This text of 803 A.2d 1175 (K.H. v. J.R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
K.H. v. J.R., 803 A.2d 1175, 569 Pa. 235, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 1647 (Pa. 2002).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 13th day of August, 2002, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are hereby GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issues:
a. Whether Appellees, who sought review of an order granting summary judgment and an order denying post-trial motions, were required to file separate notices of appeal?
b. Whether Joseph Reith, a non-custodial parent with shared custody of his son, had a duty to supervise him pursuant to Section 316 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts?
c. Whether a verdict of $4,625, awarded solely for pain and suffering, was inadequate as bearing no reasonable relation to the loss suffered?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
803 A.2d 1175, 569 Pa. 235, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 1647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kh-v-jr-pa-2002.