Kezar & Stoddard Co. v. Portland Wet Wash Laundry

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Kezar & Stoddard Co. v. Portland Wet Wash Laundry

125 Me. 523

DecidedOctober 8, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 125 Me. 523 (Kezar & Stoddard Co. v. Portland Wet Wash Laundry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kezar & Stoddard Co. v. Portland Wet Wash Laundry, 125 Me. 523 (Me. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

This was an action brought to recover the purchase price of a pump installed by plaintiff in defendant’s laundry. Defendant contended that the pump was unfit for the purpose for which it was intended. Plaintiff denied this contention. A plain issue of fact was joined. The jury found for the plaintiff and it cannot be said that the record discloses any sound reason for disturbing the verdict. Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This was an action brought to recover the purchase price of a pump installed by plaintiff in defendant’s laundry. Defendant contended that the pump was unfit for the purpose for which it was intended. Plaintiff denied this contention. A plain issue of fact was joined. The jury found for the plaintiff and it cannot be said that the record discloses any sound reason for disturbing the verdict. Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 Me. 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kezar-stoddard-co-v-portland-wet-wash-laundry-me-1926.