Keystone Pecan Co. v. Clark

102 S.E. 352, 149 Ga. 836, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 420
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 14, 1920
DocketNo. 1394
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 102 S.E. 352 (Keystone Pecan Co. v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keystone Pecan Co. v. Clark, 102 S.E. 352, 149 Ga. 836, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 420 (Ga. 1920).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

1. Under the pleadings and the evidence the court did not err in refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction.

2. An issue riot made by the pleadings of either party is not before the court, though evidence upon the issue was submitted upon the hearing for interlocutory injunction, and counsel for both parties, in their briefs of file in this court, treat the issue as in the case. See Hicks v. Marshall, 67 Ga. 713; Martin v. Nichols, 127 Ga. 705 (56 S. E. 995). Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Petition for injunction. Before Judge Harrell. Calhoun superior court. March 4, 1919. Milner & Farkas, for plaintiff. Yeomans & Wilkinson and Robert R. Forrester, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Hogans
29 S.E.2d 568 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Realty Construction Co. v. Freeman
163 S.E. 732 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 S.E. 352, 149 Ga. 836, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keystone-pecan-co-v-clark-ga-1920.