Keystone Pecan Co. v. Clark
This text of 102 S.E. 352 (Keystone Pecan Co. v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Under the pleadings and the evidence the court did not err in refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction.
2. An issue riot made by the pleadings of either party is not before the court, though evidence upon the issue was submitted upon the hearing for interlocutory injunction, and counsel for both parties, in their briefs of file in this court, treat the issue as in the case. See Hicks v. Marshall, 67 Ga. 713; Martin v. Nichols, 127 Ga. 705 (56 S. E. 995). Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 S.E. 352, 149 Ga. 836, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keystone-pecan-co-v-clark-ga-1920.