Keystone Associates v. Moerdler

224 N.E.2d 744, 19 N.Y.2d 598, 278 N.Y.S.2d 243, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1817
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 12, 1967·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Motion for reargument, clarification of the opinion, amendment of the remittitur and for a further stay denied and temporary stay vacated upon service on respondent Commissioner of Buildings of a copy of the order entered hereon. As we read the statute (L. 1966, ch. 69T), it is indivisible and must be taken as a whole. Consequently, séction 8 is not severable. [See 19 N Y 2d 78.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keystone Associates v. Moerdler, 224 N.E.2d 744, 19 N.Y.2d 598, 278 N.Y.S.2d 243, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1817 (N.Y. 1967).

224 N.E.2d 744 (Keystone Associates v. Moerdler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williamsburg Candy & Tobacco, Inc. v. State
106 Misc. 2d 728 (New York State Court of Claims, 1981)
City School District of the City of Kingston v. Vasilevich
61 A.D.2d 276 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)