Keys v. State

100 S.E. 764, 24 Ga. App. 360, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 660
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 4, 1919
Docket10887
StatusPublished

This text of 100 S.E. 764 (Keys v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keys v. State, 100 S.E. 764, 24 Ga. App. 360, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 660 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Broyt.es, C. J'.

1. The court did not err in failing to charge the jury upon the law of larceny.

2. The alleged newly discovered evidence, which is the basis of the second special ground of the motion for a new trial, is cumulative in character and is not such evidence as would probably cause a different result upon another trial of the case.

3. The evidence amply authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 S.E. 764, 24 Ga. App. 360, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keys-v-state-gactapp-1919.