Keys v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Keys v. State

33 S.E. 632, 108 Ga. 771, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 382

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 17, 1899·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Cobb, J.

There was, in the present case, no evidence to warrant a conviction of the offense charged, and consequently the court erred in denying a new trial. Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Indictment for larceny after trust. Before Judge Fite, Catoosa superior court. August term, 1898.

W. E. Mann, for plaintiff in error. Sam P. Maddox, solicitor-general, by Albert S. Johnson, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cobb, J.

There was, in the present case, no evidence to warrant a conviction of the offense charged, and consequently the court erred in denying a new trial. Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Indictment for larceny after trust. Before Judge Fite, Catoosa superior court. August term, 1898.

W. E. Mann, for plaintiff in error. Sam P. Maddox, solicitor-general, by Albert S. Johnson, contra.

Keys v. State, 33 S.E. 632, 108 Ga. 771, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 382 (Ga. 1899).

Pincite

33 S.E. 632 (Keys v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related