Keyon Harrison v. Curtis Vanderkooi

Michigan Supreme Court

Keyon Harrison v. Curtis Vanderkooi

DecidedFebruary 26, 2021

Docket160959

StatusPublished

This text of Keyon Harrison v. Curtis Vanderkooi (Keyon Harrison v. Curtis Vanderkooi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keyon Harrison v. Curtis Vanderkooi, (Mich. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

February 26, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

160958-9 Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement DENISHIO JOHNSON, Megan K. Cavanagh Plaintiff-Appellant, Elizabeth M. Welch, Justices v SC: 160958 COA: 330536 Kent CC: 14-007226-NO CURT VANDERKOOI, ELLIOT BARGAS, and CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS, Defendants-Appellees. _________________________________________/ KEYON HARRISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: 160959 COA: 330537 Kent CC: 14-002166-NO CURT VANDERKOOI and CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS, Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 21, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether fingerprinting constitutes a search for Fourth Amendment purposes; (2) if it does, whether fingerprinting based on no more than a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, as authorized by the Grand Rapids Police Department’s “photograph and print” procedures, is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment; and (3) whether fingerprinting exceeds the scope of a permissible seizure pursuant to Terry v Ohio, 392 US 1 (1968). The total time allowed for oral argument shall be 40 minutes: 20 minutes for the appellants, and 20 minutes for appellee City of Grand Rapids. MCR 7.314(B)(1).

The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. February 26, 2021 t0223 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

February 26, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

160958-9 Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement DENISHIO JOHNSON, Megan K. Cavanagh Plaintiff-Appellant, Elizabeth M. Welch, Justices v SC: 160958 COA: 330536 Kent CC: 14-007226-NO CURT VANDERKOOI, ELLIOT BARGAS, and CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS, Defendants-Appellees. _________________________________________/ KEYON HARRISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: 160959 COA: 330537 Kent CC: 14-002166-NO CURT VANDERKOOI and CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS, Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 21, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether fingerprinting constitutes a search for Fourth Amendment purposes; (2) if it does, whether fingerprinting based on no more than a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, as authorized by the Grand Rapids Police Department’s “photograph and print” procedures, is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment; and (3) whether fingerprinting exceeds the scope of a permissible seizure pursuant to Terry v Ohio, 392 US 1 (1968). The total time allowed for oral argument shall be 40 minutes: 20 minutes for the appellants, and 20 minutes for appellee City of Grand Rapids. MCR 7.314(B)(1).

The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. February 26, 2021 t0223 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Keyon Harrison v. Curtis Vanderkooi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keyon-harrison-v-curtis-vanderkooi-mich-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack