Keynetik, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
This text of Keynetik, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Keynetik, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 22-1128 Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 01/18/2023
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
KEYNETIK, INC., Appellant
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Appellee ______________________
2022-1128 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018- 00985. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
MARK W. HALDERMAN, Armstrong Teasdale, LLP, Phil- adelphia, PA, argued for appellant. Also represented by EDWARD F. BEHM.
PHILLIP W. CITROEN, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by CHETAN BANSAL, STEPHEN BLAKE KINNAIRD, ALEXA LOWMAN, NAVEEN MODI, JOSEPH PALYS. ______________________ Case: 22-1128 Document: 37 Page: 2 Filed: 01/18/2023
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, DYK and PROST, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 18, 2023 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Keynetik, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keynetik-inc-v-samsung-electronics-co-ltd-cafc-2023.