Keynetik, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided January 18, 2023·No. 22-1128·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 22-1128 Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 01/18/2023

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

KEYNETIK, INC.,

Appellant

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Appellee

2022-1128

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018- 00985.

JUDGMENT

MARK W. HALDERMAN, Armstrong Teasdale, LLP, Philadelphia , PA, argued for appellant. Also represented by EDWARD F. BEHM.

PHILLIP W. CITROEN, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by CHETAN BANSAL, STEPHEN BLAKE KINNAIRD, ALEXA LOWMAN, NAVEEN MODI, JOSEPH PALYS.

Case: 22-1128 Document: 37 Page: 2 Filed: 01/18/2023

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, DYK and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 18, 2023 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keynetik, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., (Fed. Cir. 2023).

Keynetik, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Keynetik, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.