Keyes v. Trans Con Line, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Keyes v. Trans Con Line, Inc.

111 A.D.2d 849, 491 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50103

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 17, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 111 A.D.2d 849 (Keyes v. Trans Con Line, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keyes v. Trans Con Line, Inc., 111 A.D.2d 849, 491 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50103 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review an order of the State Division of Human Rights, dated December 23,1983, which determined that there was no probable cause to believe that respondent had engaged in an unlawful discriminatory practice.

Proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Petitioner failed to seek judicial review within 60 days of the effective date of Laws of 1984 (ch 83) as required. Consequently, the petition must be dismissed (Alecsandrescu v Board of Educ., 63 AD2d 955). Were we to have considered this proceeding on its merits, we would have dismissed it because petitioner failed to make out a prima facie case of retaliation based upon substantial evidence. Mollen, P. J., Rubin, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review an order of the State Division of Human Rights, dated December 23,1983, which determined that there was no probable cause to believe that respondent had engaged in an unlawful discriminatory practice.

Proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Petitioner failed to seek judicial review within 60 days of the effective date of Laws of 1984 (ch 83) as required. Consequently, the petition must be dismissed (Alecsandrescu v Board of Educ., 63 AD2d 955). Were we to have considered this proceeding on its merits, we would have dismissed it because petitioner failed to make out a prima facie case of retaliation based upon substantial evidence. Mollen, P. J., Rubin, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 A.D.2d 849, 491 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keyes-v-trans-con-line-inc-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack