Keyes v. School District No. 1

402 U.S. 182, 91 S. Ct. 1399, 28 L. Ed. 2d 710, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 48
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 26, 1971·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The sole basis for the Tenth Circuit’s action in granting the stay of the District Court’s order in this case was the view “that it would be unfair to the School District to compel it to take further steps in the implementation of the total plan until [the Tenth Circuit] and the party litigants have the benefit of the United States Supreme Court decisions in the Swann and combined desegregation cases . . . .”

The decisions in those cases having now been announced, it is proper to vacate the stay and remit the matter to the Court of Appeals freed of its earlier speculation as to the bearing of our decision in Swann and related cases.

We, of course, intimate no views upon the merits of the underlying issues.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keyes v. School District No. 1, 402 U.S. 182, 91 S. Ct. 1399, 28 L. Ed. 2d 710, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 48 (1971).

402 U.S. 182 (Keyes v. School District No. 1) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

County of Suffolk v. United States
36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,793 (Court of Claims, 1990)
Holiday Spas v. Montgomery County Human Relations Commission
554 A.2d 1197 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1989)
Armato v. New York
520 F. Supp. 1205 (S.D. New York, 1981)
State v. Bontempo
406 A.2d 203 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
Keyes v. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1, DENVER, COLO.
439 F. Supp. 393 (D. Colorado, 1977)
Keyes v. School Dist. No. 1, Denver
413 U.S. 189 (Supreme Court, 1973)