Keyes v. Rolph

California Court of Appeal

Keyes v. Rolph

58 Cal. App. 788

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJuly 11, 1922

DocketCiv. No. 4319

StatusPublished

This text of 58 Cal. App. 788 (Keyes v. Rolph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keyes v. Rolph, 58 Cal. App. 788 (Cal. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

Let a peremptory writ issue as prayed on the authority of Oscar Heyman & Brother (a Corporation) v. Edwin C. Bath et al., ante, p. 499 [208 Pac. 981].

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on September 7, 1922.

All the Justices present concurred.

Richards, J., pro tem., and Myers, J., pro tem., were acting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

Let a peremptory writ issue as prayed on the authority of Oscar Heyman & Brother (a Corporation) v. Edwin C. Bath et al., ante, p. 499 [208 Pac. 981].

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on September 7, 1922.

All the Justices present concurred.

Richards, J., pro tem., and Myers, J., pro tem., were acting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 Cal. App. 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keyes-v-rolph-calctapp-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack