Keyes v. Illinois
242 U.S. 610, 37 S. Ct. 17, 61 L. Ed. 525, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1401
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Bergmann v. Backer, 167 U. S. 655, 656; Caldwell v. Texas, 137 U. S. 692; Howard v. Fleming, 191 U. S. 126, 135; (2) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Overton v. Oklahoma, 235 U. S. 31. Mr. Chas. H. Soelke for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Patrick J. Lucey and Mr. Lester H. Strawn for the defendant in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Keyes v. Illinois, 242 U.S. 610, 37 S. Ct. 17, 61 L. Ed. 525, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1401 (1916).
242 U.S. 610 (Keyes v. Illinois) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Caldwell v. Texas
137 U.S. 692 (Supreme Court, 1891)
Shapleigh v. San Angelo
167 U.S. 646 (Supreme Court, 1897)
Howard v. Fleming
191 U.S. 126 (Supreme Court, 1903)
Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co.
226 U.S. 102 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
228 U.S. 596 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Overton v. Oklahoma
235 U.S. 31 (Supreme Court, 1914)