Keyes v. Ellensohn

25 N.Y.S. 693, 72 Hun 392, 79 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 392, 55 N.Y. St. Rep. 486
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 13, 1893
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 25 N.Y.S. 693 (Keyes v. Ellensohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keyes v. Ellensohn, 25 N.Y.S. 693, 72 Hun 392, 79 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 392, 55 N.Y. St. Rep. 486 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The infant defendant was upward of 14 years of age when her guardian ad litem was appointed upon the petition of the plaintiffs’ attorney. An appointment of a guardian ad litem for an infant of the age of 14 years or upward cannot be made upon such a petition until after the expiration of 20 days from the time when the service of the summons is complete. Code Civil Proc. § 471.1 It is conceded that this appointment was made within the 20 days, and consequently it was premature and void. The guardian so appointed appeared in the action and answered, but made no defense on the trial, and May 5, 1892, judgment was entered against the infant. On July 24, 1892, a guardian ad litem was appointed on the petition of the infant, who moved to vacate the judgment as against his ward, which was granted. The appellants urge that a judgment against an infant- defendant for whom a guardian has not been appointed is voidable, but not void. Assume this to be so,—which we do not decide,—the special term [694]*694had the right to set aside a voidable judgment as against this infant, and wre think its discretion was wisely exercised. The order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keyes v. Ellensohn
30 N.Y.S. 1035 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 N.Y.S. 693, 72 Hun 392, 79 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 392, 55 N.Y. St. Rep. 486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keyes-v-ellensohn-nysupct-1893.