Keyes Co. v. Rocky Graziani, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Keyes Co. v. Rocky Graziani, Inc.

406 So. 2d 100, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21729

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 24, 1981

DocketNos. 81-124, 81-137

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 406 So. 2d 100 (Keyes Co. v. Rocky Graziani, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keyes Co. v. Rocky Graziani, Inc., 406 So. 2d 100, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21729 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Both parties appealing from judgments entered on adverse jury verdicts essentially complain that the verdicts represent an incorrect resolution of disputed factual issues. The appellant Keyes Company also argues that they are internally inconsistent with each other. We may not properly consider the first contention, e.g., Helman v. Seaboard Coast Line R. R., 349 So.2d 1187 (Fla.1977); First National Bank of the Upper Keys v. Caribe Equipment Corp., 378 So.2d 19 (Fla.3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 388 So.2d 1112 (Fla.1980), and the inconsistency point was waived by the failure to assert it at the trial. Robbins v. Graham, 404 So.2d 769 (Fla.4th DCA 1981); Savoca v. Sherry Frontenac Hotel Operating Co., 346 So.2d 1207 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); Wiggs and Maale Construction Co. v. Harris, 348 So.2d 914 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Crawford v. DiMicco, 216 So.2d 769 (Fla.4th DCA 1968).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Both parties appealing from judgments entered on adverse jury verdicts essentially complain that the verdicts represent an incorrect resolution of disputed factual issues. The appellant Keyes Company also argues that they are internally inconsistent with each other. We may not properly consider the first contention, e.g., Helman v. Seaboard Coast Line R. R., 349 So.2d 1187 (Fla.1977); First National Bank of the Upper Keys v. Caribe Equipment Corp., 378 So.2d 19 (Fla.3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 388 So.2d 1112 (Fla.1980), and the inconsistency point was waived by the failure to assert it at the trial. Robbins v. Graham, 404 So.2d 769 (Fla.4th DCA 1981); Savoca v. Sherry Frontenac Hotel Operating Co., 346 So.2d 1207 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); Wiggs and Maale Construction Co. v. Harris, 348 So.2d 914 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Crawford v. DiMicco, 216 So.2d 769 (Fla.4th DCA 1968).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

406 So. 2d 100, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keyes-co-v-rocky-graziani-inc-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack