Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Keyes Co. v. Leeds Fasilis, Inc.

Keyes Co. v. Leeds Fasilis, Inc.

458 So. 2d 1190, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2385, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15961
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 14, 1984·No. No. 83-1601·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court dismissed with prejudice the Second Amended Complaint filed by The Keyes Company. Keyes appeals. We reverse and remand.

We have examined the Complaint m detail and in light of the appellate treatment. We determine that it stated a cause of action sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss based upon allegations of an intentional interference with an existing contractual relationship with resulting damages. See Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc. v. Cotton, 432 So.2d 148 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Wackenhut Corp. v. Maimone, 389 So.2d 656 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); and Mead Corp. v. Mason, 191 So.2d 592 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966).

Reversed and remanded.

DOWNEY, WALDEN and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keyes Co. v. Leeds Fasilis, Inc., 458 So. 2d 1190, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2385, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15961 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

458 So. 2d 1190 (Keyes Co. v. Leeds Fasilis, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc. v. Cotton
432 So. 2d 148 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Wackenhut Corp. v. Maimone
389 So. 2d 656 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Mead Corporation v. Mason
191 So. 2d 592 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)