Keyes Co. v. Leeds Fasilis, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Keyes Co. v. Leeds Fasilis, Inc.

458 So. 2d 1190, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2385, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15961

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 14, 1984

DocketNo. 83-1601

StatusPublished

This text of 458 So. 2d 1190 (Keyes Co. v. Leeds Fasilis, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keyes Co. v. Leeds Fasilis, Inc., 458 So. 2d 1190, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2385, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15961 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court dismissed with prejudice the Second Amended Complaint filed by The Keyes Company. Keyes appeals. We reverse and remand.

We have examined the Complaint m detail and in light of the appellate treatment. We determine that it stated a cause of action sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss based upon allegations of an intentional interference with an existing contractual relationship with resulting damages. See Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc. v. Cotton, 432 So.2d 148 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Wackenhut Corp. v. Maimone, 389 So.2d 656 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); and Mead Corp. v. Mason, 191 So.2d 592 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966).

Reversed and remanded.

DOWNEY, WALDEN and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI