Key v. Withers & Wellford

131 So. 868, 159 Miss. 125, 1931 Miss. LEXIS 22
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 12, 1931
DocketNo. 29041.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 131 So. 868 (Key v. Withers & Wellford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Key v. Withers & Wellford, 131 So. 868, 159 Miss. 125, 1931 Miss. LEXIS 22 (Mich. 1931).

Opinion

Anderson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The appellees brought this action against the appellant in the county court of Washington county to recover the invoice price of certain petroleum products delivered by appellees to the appellant, under a written contract entered into between the parties. There was a trial before the county judge, sitting as both judge and jury, result *128 ing in a judgment in appellant’s favor. From that judgment appellees appealed to the circuit court, where the judgment of the county court was reversed. Following the procedure laid down by the county court statute (Code 1930, section 704), a final judgment was entered in the circuit court for appellees, from which judgment appellant prosecutes this appeal.

On August 6, 1926, appellant and appellees entered into a written contract, the pertinent parts of which were as follows:

“1. The First Party (appellees) agrees to deliver to the Second P'arty (appellant) from time to time such goods, wares and merchandise, consisting of gasoline, kerosene,, lubricating' oils, greases and other petroleum products, as in its judgment, may see fit, and the Second Party agrees to receive and accept possession of the said goods, wares and merchandise, upon the terms and conditions hereinafter stated.
“2. The Second Party agrees to receive and accept possession of the said goods, wares and merchandise from the First Party and to hold and care for the same as the property of the First Party, it being expressly agreed that the title to said goods, wares and merchandise or of the proceeds thereof, shall always be vested in the First P,arty, and such merchandise shall be, at all times, subject to and under the control of the First Party. The title to the said goods, wares and merchandise shall pass directly from the First Party to such person, or persons, to whom the same shall be sold, in the manner and upon the terms set forth.
‘ ‘ 3. The Second Party shall keep said wares, goods and merchandise fully insured against loss or damage by reason of fire, for the benefit of and in the name of the First Party with a solvent fire insurance company or companies approved by the First Party as insurer or insurers.
*129 “4. The Second Party agrees to:
“(a) Sell snch goods, wares and merchandise to such person or persons as it shall judge to be of good credit and business standing, and,
“ (b) Collect for, and in behalf of, the First Party all bills and accounts for the goods, wares, and merchandise so sold, and,
“(c) On' or before the 1st day of each and every calendar month hereafter to render to First Party an account of statement showing' all such goods, wares and merchandise delivered to and received by the Second Party as herein provided during the preceding calendar month, the amount thereof on hand at the end of the preceding calendar month, and the names and addresses of any person or persons to whom any of such goods, wares and merchandise may have been sold by the Second Party during the preceding calendar month, together with the amount and character of such merchandise so sold, the consideration received or agreed to be paid therefor and how evidenced, and such other information pertaining to the sale or other disposition of such goods, wares and merchandise as the First Party may from time to time require, and at or before the times provided for making said report, account or statement, to pay to the First Party any amount collected as aforesaid, less, however, the difference between the price at which the goods, wares and merchandise so collected for shall have been invoiced to the Second Party, less any discounts from invoice prices which may have been allowed by the First Party, and the price at which said goods, wares and merchandise shall have been sold as aforesaid by the Second Party.
“5. The Second Party hereby guarantees the payment of all bills and accounts for goods, wares and merchandise, possession of which may be delivered to the Second Party hereunder and which may have been sold by the Second Party under this agreement; and the Second *130 Party hereby agrees that, if any goods, wares or merchandise delivered hereunder by the First Party to the Second Party shall not be accounted for to the First Party in accordance with the provisions of clause ‘4.’ of this agreement next above, the Second Party will pay to the First Party on or before the - day of the next calendar month subsequent to that in which said goods, wares and merchandise were delivered to and received by the Second Party, the invoice price thereof, less any discounts from invoice price which may have been allowed by the First Party; thereupon the title to said goods, wares and merchandise so paid for, or to the proceeds thereof shall vest in the Second Party, and be exempt from the provisions of this agreement.” Appellant defended the action upon the ground that the petroleum products, the invoice price of which was sued for, were destroyed by the act of God at a time when appellant had not become indebted to appellees for their invoice price, and therefore the loss fell upon appellees, and not upon appellant; the title to the goods being in appellees at the time of the loss. According to appellant’s evidence, the goods were destroyed by the flood of April, 1927. The county judge, sitting as judge and jury, found the material facts in appellant’s favor, and rendered judgment dismissing’ appellees’ suit.

■ In the trial of the cause the circuit court sat as a court -of appeals, the record on appeal in the circuit court being the record of the cause made in the county court. The findings of a county judge, sitting as both judge and jury on issues of fact, are entitled to the same weight on an appeal to the circuit court as is the verdict of a jury. The county court, in order to render the judgment it did render, necessarily found as a fact that the goods involved were destroyed by an act of God, for which appellant was not responsible, and that at the time of their destruction, they were the property of appellees, and not of appellant; and appellant had not become indebted to *131 appellees for their invoice price, and therefore the loss fell upon the former, and not upon the latter. On appeal to the circuit court, that court, while necessarily accepting as true the findings of fact of the county court, found the law of the case in appellees’ favor, and rendered judgment accordingly.

Appellees seek to justify the judgment of the circuit court under paragraph 5 of the contract, in connection with subdivision (c) in paragraph 4 of the contract.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Voss v. Stewart
420 So. 2d 761 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1982)
Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Bank of Mantee
241 So. 2d 822 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1970)
Pearson v. Weaver
173 So. 2d 666 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1965)
Hall v. State Ex Rel. Waller
157 So. 2d 781 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 So. 868, 159 Miss. 125, 1931 Miss. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/key-v-withers-wellford-miss-1931.