Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma/Key v. State

Key v. State

1919 OK CR 60, 177 P. 550, 15 Okla. Crim. 684, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 26
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 11, 1919
DocketNo. A-3026.
StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 60 (Key v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Key v. State, 1919 OK CR 60, 177 P. 550, 15 Okla. Crim. 684, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 26 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was by indictment duly returned by a grand jury of the-district court of Carter county charged with keeping a place in the city of Ardmore, with the intent and purpose of selling intoxicating liquors. To reverse the judgment rendered on the verdict he appeals.

In the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, the statute upon which this prosecution was based was held unconstitutional and void. For the reasons stated in that opinion, the judgment appealed from is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proctor v. State
1918 OK CR 190 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1919 OK CR 60, 177 P. 550, 15 Okla. Crim. 684, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/key-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.