Key v. State
1919 OK CR 60, 177 P. 550, 15 Okla. Crim. 684, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 26
Opinion
The plaintiff in error was by indictment duly returned by a grand jury of the-district court of Carter county charged with keeping a place in the city of Ardmore, with the intent and purpose of selling intoxicating liquors. To reverse the judgment rendered on the verdict he appeals.
In the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, the statute upon which this prosecution was based was held unconstitutional and void. For the reasons stated in that opinion, the judgment appealed from is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Key v. State, 1919 OK CR 60, 177 P. 550, 15 Okla. Crim. 684, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 26 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).
1919 OK CR 60 (Key v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Proctor v. State
1918 OK CR 190 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1918)