Key v. State
70 S.E. 156, 8 Ga. App. 849, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 170
Opinion
1. The evidence fully authorized the verdict.
2. There was no error in the admission of the testimony complained of.
3. The alleged newly discovered evidence was not such as to justify this court in overruling the exercise of discretion by the trial judge in refusing a new trial therefor; especially is this true in the light of the counter-showing. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Key v. State, 70 S.E. 156, 8 Ga. App. 849, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 170 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).
70 S.E. 156 (Key v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ware v. State
89 S.E. 155 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)