Key v. Forshagen

57 S.W.2d 232
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 28, 1933·No. No. 1317.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ALEXANDER, Justice.

This suit, based on a promissory note due September 15, 1927, was filed September 15, 1931. The defendant’s plea of limitation was overruled, and judgment entered for plaintiff. The defendant appealed.

• [1,2] The defendant had all of September 15, 1927, in which to pay the note, and the cause of action therefore did not accrue until September 16, 1927. 6 Tex. Jur. 680, 878; Standard v. Thurmond (Tex. Civ. App.) 151 S. W. 627; Smith v. Dickey, 74 Tex. 61, 11 S. W. 1049; Geistweidt v. Mann (Tex. Civ. App.) 37 S. W. 372; Payne v. Wittenberg (Tex. Civ. App.) 239 S. W. 224. The suit was filed within four years from the time the cause of action accrued, and was not barred by limitation. Revised Statutes, article 5527; Watkins v. Willis & Bro., 58 Tex. 521.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Key v. Forshagen, 57 S.W.2d 232 (Tex. Ct. App. 1933).

57 S.W.2d 232 (Key v. Forshagen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seibert v. Sally
238 S.W.2d 266 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1951)
Douglas v. Acacia Mut. Life Ins. Co.
118 S.W.2d 643 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Price v. Wood
88 S.W.2d 530 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1935)
McLaughlin v. Horn-Allen Co.
76 S.W.2d 226 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Hardy v. City of Throckmorton
70 S.W.2d 775 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1934)